Rachel Moore Rachel Moore's Profile Page

Rachel Moore Rachel Moore

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf Dumps - PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Latest Dumps Files

It can be said that all the content of the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 prepare questions are from the experts in the field of masterpieces, and these are understandable and easy to remember, so users do not have to spend a lot of time to remember and learn our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam questions. It takes only a little practice on a daily basis to get the desired results. Especially in the face of some difficult problems, the user does not need to worry too much, just learn the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Practice Guide provide questions and answers, you can simply pass the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam.

The customers can immediately start using the Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) exam dumps of CramPDF after buying it. In this way, one can save time and instantly embark on the journey of Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall (PSE-Strata-Pro-24) test preparation. 24/7 customer service is also available at CramPDF. Feel free to reach our customer support team if you have any questions about our PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Preparation material.

>> PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf Dumps <<

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Latest Dumps Files - PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Study Guide Pdf

The customizable Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice tests create a scenario of a real-based Palo Alto Networks which is helpful for students so they don’t feel much pressure when they are giving the final examination. The students can give unlimited PSE-Strata-Pro-24 practice tests and make themselves better day by day to achieve their desired destination. The candidates can even access their previously given Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Practice Test from the history which allows them to be careful while giving the test next time and prepare for Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 certification in a better way.

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Sample Questions (Q38-Q43):

NEW QUESTION # 38
What are three valid Panorama deployment options? (Choose three.)

A. With a cloud service provider (AWS, Azure, GCP)
B. As a virtual machine (ESXi, Hyper-V, KVM)
C. As a dedicated hardware appliance (M-100, M-200, M-500, M-600)
D. On a Raspberry Pi (Model 4, Model 400, Model 5)
E. As a container (Docker, Kubernetes, OpenShift)

Answer: A,B,C

Explanation:
Panorama is Palo Alto Networks' centralized management solution for managing multiple firewalls. It supports multiple deployment options to suit different infrastructure needs. The valid deployment options are as follows:
* Why "As a virtual machine (ESXi, Hyper-V, KVM)" (Correct Answer A)?Panorama can be deployed as a virtual machine on hypervisors like VMware ESXi, Microsoft Hyper-V, and KVM. This is a common option for organizations that already utilize virtualized infrastructure.
* Why "With a cloud service provider (AWS, Azure, GCP)" (Correct Answer B)?Panorama is available for deployment in the public cloud on platforms like AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. This allows organizations to centrally manage firewalls deployed in cloud environments.
* Why "As a dedicated hardware appliance (M-100, M-200, M-500, M-600)" (Correct Answer E)?
Panorama is available as a dedicated hardware appliance with different models (M-100, M-200, M-500, M-600) to cater to various performance and scalability requirements. This is ideal for organizations that prefer physical appliances.
* Why not "As a container (Docker, Kubernetes, OpenShift)" (Option C)?Panorama is not currently supported as a containerized deployment. Containers are more commonly used for lightweight and ephemeral services, whereas Panorama requires a robust and persistent deployment model.
* Why not "On a Raspberry Pi (Model 4, Model 400, Model 5)" (Option D)?Panorama cannot be deployed on low-powered hardware like Raspberry Pi. The system requirements for Panorama far exceed the capabilities of Raspberry Pi hardware.

NEW QUESTION # 39
With Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) or Panorama, customers can monitor and manage which three solutions?
(Choose three.)

A. Prisma SD-WAN
B. Prisma Cloud
C. NGFW
D. Cortex XSIAM
E. Prisma Access

Answer: A,C,E

Explanation:
* Prisma Access (Answer A):
* Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) and Panorama provide centralized visibility and management for Prisma Access, Palo Alto Networks' cloud-delivered security platform for remote users and branch offices.
* NGFW (Answer D):
* Both SCM and Panorama are used to manage and monitorPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls(NGFWs) deployed in on-premise, hybrid, or multi-cloud environments.
* Prisma SD-WAN (Answer E):
* SCM and Panorama integrate withPrisma SD-WANto manage branch connectivity and security, ensuring seamless operation in an SD-WAN environment.
* Why Not B:
* Prisma Cloudis a distinct platform designed for cloud-native security and is not directly managed through Strata Cloud Manager or Panorama.
* Why Not C:
* Cortex XSIAM(Extended Security Intelligence and Automation Management) is part of the Cortex platform and is not managed by SCM or Panorama.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Strata Cloud Manager Overview
* Panorama Features and Benefits

NEW QUESTION # 40
Which two products can be integrated and managed by Strata Cloud Manager (SCM)? (Choose two)

A. Prisma SD-WAN
B. Prisma Cloud
C. Cortex XDR
D. VM-Series NGFW

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) is Palo Alto Networks' centralized cloud-based management platform for managing network security solutions, including Prisma Access and Prisma SD-WAN. SCM can also integrate with VM-Series firewalls for managing virtualized NGFW deployments.
Why A (Prisma SD-WAN) Is Correct
* SCM is the management interface for Prisma SD-WAN, enabling centralized orchestration, monitoring, and configuration of SD-WAN deployments.
Why D (VM-Series NGFW) Is Correct
* SCM supports managing VM-Series NGFWs, providing centralized visibility and control for virtualized firewall deployments in cloud or on-premises environments.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
* B (Prisma Cloud):Prisma Cloud is a separate product for securing workloads in public cloud environments. It is not managed via SCM.
* C (Cortex XDR):Cortex XDR is a platform for endpoint detection and response (EDR). It is managed through its own console, not SCM.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks Strata Cloud Manager Overview

NEW QUESTION # 41
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?

A. It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it.
B. It can be addressed with BGP confederations.
C. It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems.
D. It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Step 1: Understand the Requirement and Context
* Customer Need: Segregate the internal network into unique BGP environments, suggesting multiple isolated or semi-isolated routing domains within a single organization.
* BGP Basics:
* BGP is a routing protocol used to exchange routing information between autonomous systems (ASes).
* eBGP: External BGP, used between different ASes.
* iBGP: Internal BGP, used within a single AS, typically requiring a full mesh of peers unless mitigated by techniques like confederations or route reflectors.
* Palo Alto NGFW: Supports BGP on virtual routers (VRs) within PAN-OS, enabling advanced routing capabilities for Strata hardware firewalls (e.g., PA-Series).
* References: "PAN-OS supports BGP for dynamic routing and network segmentation" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
Option A: It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it
* Analysis:
* PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, confederations, and route reflectors, configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP."
* Features like multiple virtual routers and BGP allow network segregation and routing policy control.
* This statement contradicts documented capabilities.
* Verification:
* "Configure BGP on a virtual router for dynamic routing" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2
/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/configure-bgp).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation techniques.Not Applicable.
Option B: It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems
* Analysis:
* eBGP: Used between distinct ASes, each with a unique AS number (e.g., AS 65001, AS 65002).
* Within a single organization, creating multiple eBGP ASes would require:
* Assigning unique AS numbers (public or private) to each internal segment.
* Treating each segment as a separate AS, peering externally with other segments via eBGP.
* Challenges:
* Internally, this isn't practical for a single network-it's more suited to external peering (e.
g., with ISPs).
* Requires complex management and public/private AS number allocation, not ideal for internal segregation.
* Doesn't leverage iBGP or confederations, which are designed for internal AS management.
* PAN-OS supports eBGP, but this approach misaligns with the intent of internal network segregation.
* Verification:
* "eBGP peers connect different ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os- networking-admin/bgp/bgp-concepts).
* Conclusion: Possible but impractical and not the intended BGP solution for internal segregation.Not Optimal.
Option C: It can be addressed with BGP confederations
* Description: BGP confederations divide a single AS into sub-ASes (each with a private Confederation Member AS number), reducing the iBGP full-mesh requirement while maintaining a unified external AS.
* Analysis:
* How It Works:
* Single AS (e.g., AS 65000) is split into sub-ASes (e.g., 65001, 65002).
* Within each sub-AS, iBGP full mesh or route reflectors are used.
* Between sub-ASes, eBGP-like peering (confederation EBGP) connects them, but externally, it appears as one AS.
* Segregation:
* Each sub-AS can represent a unique BGP environment (e.g., department, site) with its own routing policies.
* Firewalls within a sub-AS peer via iBGP; across sub-ASes, they use confederation EBGP.
* PAN-OS Support:
* Configurable under "Network > Virtual Routers > BGP > Confederation" with a Confederation Member AS number.
* Ideal for large internal networks needing segmentation without multiple public AS numbers.
* Benefits:
* Simplifies internal BGP management.
* Aligns with the customer's need for unique internal BGP environments.
* Verification:
* "BGP confederations reduce full-mesh burden by dividing an AS into sub-ASes" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* "Supports unique internal routing domains" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).
* Conclusion: Directly addresses the requirement with a supported, practical solution.Applicable.
Option D: It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work
* Analysis:
* iBGP Full Mesh: Traditional iBGP requires all routers in an AS to peer with each other, scaling poorly (n(n-1)/2 connections).
* Mitigation: PAN-OS supports alternatives:
* Route Reflectors: Centralize iBGP peering.
* Confederations: Divide the AS into sub-ASes (see Option C).
* This statement ignores these features, falsely claiming BGP's limitation prevents segregation.
* Verification:
* "Confederations and route reflectors eliminate full-mesh needs" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan- os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS overcomes full-mesh constraints.Not Applicable.
Step 3: Recommendation Justification
* Why Option C?
* Alignment: Confederations allow the internal network to be segregated into unique BGP environments (sub-ASes) while maintaining a single external AS, perfectly matching the customer's need.
* Scalability: Reduces iBGP full-mesh complexity, ideal for large or segmented internal networks.
* PAN-OS Support: Explicitly implemented in BGP configuration, validated by documentation.
* Why Not Others?
* A: False-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation.
* B: eBGP is for external ASes, not internal segregation; less practical thanconfederations.
* D: Misrepresents BGP capabilities; full mesh isn't required with confederations or route reflectors.
Step 4: Verified References
* BGP Confederations: "Divide an AS into sub-ASes for internal segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.
com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp/bgp-confederations).
* PAN-OS BGP: "Supports eBGP, iBGP, and confederations for routing flexibility" (paloaltonetworks.
com, PAN-OS Networking Guide).
* Use Case: "Confederations suit large internal networks" (knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com).

NEW QUESTION # 42
Regarding APIs, a customer RFP states: "The vendor's firewall solution must provide an API with an enforcement mechanism to deactivate API keys after two hours." How should the response address this clause?

A. Yes - This is the default setting for API keys.
B. No - The API keys can be made, but there is no method to deactivate them based on time.
C. No - The PAN-OS XML API does not support keys.
D. Yes - The default setting must be changed from no limit to 120 minutes.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Palo Alto Networks' PAN-OS supports API keys for authentication when interacting with the firewall's RESTful and XML-based APIs. By default, API keys do not have an expiration time set, but the expiration time for API keys can be configured by an administrator to meet specific requirements, such as a time-based deactivation after two hours. This is particularly useful for compliance and security purposes, where API keys should not remain active indefinitely.
Here's an evaluation of the options:
* Option A:This is incorrect because the default setting for API keys does not include an expiration time.
By default, API keys are valid indefinitely unless explicitly configured otherwise.
* Option B:This is incorrect because PAN-OS fully supports API keys. The API keys are integral to managing access to the firewall's APIs and provide a secure method for authentication.
* Option C:This is incorrect because PAN-OS does support API key expiration when explicitly configured. While the default is "no expiration," the feature to configure an expiration time (e.g., 2 hours) is available.
* Option D (Correct):The correct response to the RFP clause is that the default API key settings need to be modified to set the expiration time to 120 minutes (2 hours). This aligns with the customer requirement to enforce API key deactivation based on time. Administrators can configure this using the PAN-OS management interface or the CLI.
How to Configure API Key Expiration (Steps):
* Access theWeb InterfaceorCLIon the firewall.
* Navigate toDevice > Management > API Key Lifetime Settings(on the GUI).
* Set the desired expiration time (e.g., 120 minutes).
* Alternatively, use the CLI to configure the API key expiration:
set deviceconfig system api-key-expiry <time-in-minutes>
commit
* Verify the configuration using the show command or by testing API calls to ensure the key expires after the set duration.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks API Documentation: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/apis
* Configuration Guide: Managing API Key Expiration

NEW QUESTION # 43
......

CramPDF senior experts have developed exercises and answers about Palo Alto Networks certification PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam with their knowledge and experience, which have 95% similarity with the real exam. I believe that you will be very confident of our products. If you choose to use CramPDF's products, CramPDF can help you 100% pass your first time to attend Palo Alto Networks Certification PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam. If you fail the exam, we will give a full refund to you.

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Latest Dumps Files: https://www.crampdf.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-exam-prep-dumps.html

It just needs to spend 20-30 hours on the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 test simulator preparation, which can allow you to face with PSE-Strata-Pro-24 actual test with confidence, We know your needs, and we will help you gain confidence to pass the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 valid study test give you an in-depth understanding of the contents and help you to make out a detail study plan for PSE-Strata-Pro-24 preparation, Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Pdf Dumps If you are better, you will have a more relaxed life.

The Elusive Feature: Creating Snaking Reports, Everyone in Sales PSE-Strata-Pro-24 uses folder views to organize, sort, and filter contact information, and they do not want to switch to other methods.

It just needs to spend 20-30 hours on the PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Test Simulator preparation, which can allow you to face with PSE-Strata-Pro-24 actual test with confidence, We know your needs, and we will help you gain confidence to pass the Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam.

Quiz 2025 PSE-Strata-Pro-24: Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall Pdf Dumps

PSE-Strata-Pro-24 valid study test give you an in-depth understanding of the contents and help you to make out a detail study plan for PSE-Strata-Pro-24 preparation, If you are better, you will have a more relaxed life.

Don't worry, PSE-Strata-Pro-24 sure pass exam cram will be your best study guide and assist you to achieve your goals.

Rachel Moore Rachel Moore

Biography

Subscribe

All Access Membership